The principle relationship between the part to the whole is probably best known as the Butterfly Effect in lieu of a unconventional yet widely popular cinematic portrayal of the principle. In the field of physics the principle is called quantum entanglement in reference to the equal opposite dual entangled nature of subatomic particles, but historical evidence suggests that the idea is ancient, and that its application has been documented in surviving texts and practices that date back to prehistoric time.
Concieved without the technology that we use to observe the dual entangled nature of subatomic particles, the ancient Vedic sages relied implicitly on their observations of Nature itself to inform the vested nature of creation and manifestation that they had documented more than 2 thousand years ago. Long before we developed the means to peer into oblivion and managed to prove the dual entangled nature of matter our ancestors had documented the nature of creation and defined the fundamental principles and immutable laws we now recognize as the dual entangled building blocks of subatomic particles. And as practical proof of the principle they devised a tool that has been in use ever since they fathomed the ebb and flow of Nature’s cocreative confluence.
According to a recent article in skeptic.com the illusion of understanding often occurs due to a slew of biases, with selection and confirmation bias noted as those that were particularly relevant to the matter at hand. Bias distort our perception of the present by favouring sensory data that support a preferred narrative or point of view, or the collective unconscious adaptation to a misinformed reality in defence of the status quo. Whereas the truth of the matter abide in our unwitting conviction and defiant determination to defend the status quo, to ‘understand’ our lack of understanding needs a perspective that informs the present with the necessary sense. To realise the unadulterated nature of creation and accept the flow of change we manifest intent we need to acknowledge the mutual relevance we share regardless of our conviction, culture, creed or cast.
Concieved without the technology that we use to observe the dual entangled nature of subatomic particles, the ancient Vedic sages relied implicitly on their observations of Nature itself to inform the vested nature of creation and manifestation that they had documented more than 2 thousand years ago. Long before we developed the means to peer into oblivion and managed to prove the dual entangled nature of matter our ancestors had documented the nature of creation and defined the fundamental principles and immutable laws we now recognize as the dual entangled building blocks of subatomic particles. And as practical proof of the principle they devised a tool that has been in use ever since they fathomed the ebb and flow of Nature’s cocreative confluence.
According to a recent article in skeptic.com the illusion of understanding often occurs due to a slew of biases, with selection and confirmation bias noted as those that were particularly relevant to the matter at hand. Bias distort our perception of the present by favouring sensory data that support a preferred narrative or point of view, or the collective unconscious adaptation to a misinformed reality in defence of the status quo. Whereas the truth of the matter abide in our unwitting conviction and defiant determination to defend the status quo, to ‘understand’ our lack of understanding needs a perspective that informs the present with the necessary sense. To realise the unadulterated nature of creation and accept the flow of change we manifest intent we need to acknowledge the mutual relevance we share regardless of our conviction, culture, creed or cast.